The
Supreme Court today quashed the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR)
against former Director General of Police (DGP) MS Jaffar Sait in a money
laundering case, ruling that the Madras High Court had committed an error by
rehearing the matter after it had already allowed Sait’s quashing petition,
without issuing notice to the concerned parties. A bench comprising Justice
Abhay S. Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan allowed Sait’s appeal challenging the
Madras High Court’s decision to relist for hearing his petition, which had
earlier been allowed. In doing so, the Supreme Court also disposed of Criminal
OP No. 17762 of 2024, which was the petition filed by Sait before the High
Court seeking quashing of the ECIR.
The
Supreme Court noted that since Sait had filed his appeal before it, the
predicate offence in the case had already been quashed against all the accused.
“The only option left is to quash the ECIR,” the Court observed. The
allegations against Sait pertained to the illegal acquisition of a plot from
the Tamil Nadu Housing Board in 2011. The Directorate of Vigilance and
Anti-Corruption had registered a corruption case, which served as the predicate
offence for the money laundering proceedings initiated by the Enforcement
Directorate (ED). This predicate offence was quashed by the Madras High Court
in 2019. Sait subsequently filed a petition before the High Court to quash the
ECIR dated June 22, 2020, along with all related proceedings initiated by the
ED.
On
August 21, 2024, the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, comprising
Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice V. Sivagnanam, orally pronounced an order in
open court allowing Sait’s writ petition and quashing the ED complaint.
However, without issuing any notice to the parties, the same bench relisted the
matter for rehearing on August 23, 2024. After this rehearing, the High Court
reserved its judgment, prompting Sait to approach the Supreme Court. The apex
court stayed the High Court’s proceedings on September 6, 2024, and directed
the Registrar General of the Madras High Court to examine the case records. On
September 30, 2024, the Supreme Court observed that the conduct of the Madras
High Court was “absolutely wrong.” The Registrar General’s report confirmed
that a final order had indeed been passed on August 21, 2024, allowing the writ
petition, and the case status on the court’s official portal reflected this
until oral directions were issued by the judges later that evening to relist
the case for August 23, 2024
“The petition was first allowed and then
relisted for hearing. From the report of the Registrar General of the High
Court we have no manner of doubt that the petition was allowed but the reasoned
order was not uploaded”, the Court observed. The Court clarified that if the
order quashing the predicate offence is later set aside, the Enforcement
Directorate may apply to the Supreme Court for recall of this order and for
restoration of the ECIR.