In a landmark judgment delivered on April
30, 2025, the Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that the caste system is
incompatible with the principles of Christianity. The Court held that a person
who has converted to Christianity and actively follows and practices the faith
can no longer be considered a member of the Scheduled Caste community. As a
result, such an individual is not entitled to seek protection under the
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The caste system is alien to Christianity.
Having converted to Christianity and admitting his role as a Pastor in a Church
the 2nd respondent could not invoke the provisions of the Scheduled Caste,
Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,” the Court said.
Quashing charges filed by a complainant who
had converted to Christianity and had invoked the SC & ST Act, a Single
Judge Bench of Justice Harinath N. further held,
“The SC ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
is a protective legislation introduced for preventing atrocities against
members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. In the present case, the 2nd
respondent has misused the Protective Legislation though he is not entitled to
invoke the provisions of the Act. The 2nd respondent had voluntarily converted
to Christianity and was admittedly working as a Pastor in a Church for the last
10 years as on the date of incident. Thus, the 2nd respondent cannot be permitted
to invoke the provisions of the Protective Legislation.”
While the complainant had contended that
despite conversion, he still possessed the Scheduled Caste Certificate, the
Court held that “mere non-cancellation of the caste certificate by the
authority to a person who has converted into Christianity cannot instill the
protection granted under the Protective Legislation. The 2nd respondent has
ceased to be a Member of the Scheduled Caste Community, the day he had
converted into Christianity.”
The case is as follows:
In a
significant ruling dated April 30, 2025, the Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed
charges filed under the SC&ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a
petitioner accused of assaulting and threatening a Pastor in Pittalavanipalem
Village. The petitioner challenged the applicability of the Act, arguing that
the complainant, who had converted to Christianity and served as a Pastor for
over 10 years, could no longer claim Scheduled Caste status. Referring to the
Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, and the fundamental requirement
under Section 3 of the SC&ST Act, the Court held that the caste system is
alien to Christianity, and thus, the complainant was not entitled to invoke the
Act’s protections despite holding an SC caste certificate. The Court clarified
that the validity of the caste certificate was a separate issue to be addressed
under the Andhra Pradesh Community Certificates Act, 1993.
On
examining the charges under the Indian Penal Code (Sections 341, 506, 323 read
with 34), the Court found insufficient corroborative evidence beyond the
complainant’s statement. Witnesses, including the complainant’s wife and
others, described a general altercation involving questioning by villagers but
did not support the specific claims of assault or threats. Noting
inconsistencies and the lack of substantive witness support, the Court
concluded that the registration of the FIR under the SC&ST Act was unlawful
and that the charge sheet had been improperly filed. Accordingly, the Court
allowed the Criminal Petition and quashed all charges against the petitioner.